ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > Communiqués > No to civil and military nuclearism!
ACDN, What is it ?

News
Communiqués
External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Actions
2nd RID-NBC
3rd RID-NBC
Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World

Petitions

Correspondance
International

Medias

Background papers

EUROPE

French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

No to the EPR!
No to civil and military nuclearism!
A solution for the Iran crisis.


Published 15 April 2006

There are many reasons for opposing the building of the EPR (European Pressurised Reactor), as was seen on April 15 at the great demonstration in Cherbourg. But there is one which is highlighted by international events and which deserves to be emphasized: the EPR would contribute to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the risks of nuclear war.

France has no need of the EPR; it is conceived above all for export. Plans of it have already been sold to Finland. The first prototype and the one planned for Flamanville (Normandy) - if its construction were to go ahead - will be shop-windows intended to capture foreign buyers from around the world and particularly the developing nations. AREVA and EDF have already been approaching China and India, with the support of the French foreign office. President Chirac’s recent trip to India had two major commercial objectives: to sell arms, such as submarines and warplanes, and to sell nuclear plants, like the future EPR.

On 30 March 2006, Iran proposed the setting-up of an international consortium including France, Germany and Russia, to help the Iranians to realise their non-military nuclear ambitions. There is no doubt that if this consortium were set up France and Germany, being associated with the EPR through AREVA and SIEMENS, would use it as a sales argument.

But consider the current crisis surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme. What does it confirm? That nuclear technologies are dual, that it is impossible to build a firewall between their civilian use for energy production and their military use for making weapons. The same knowledge and the same technicians produce both, as is verified also in France. The same process of enriching uranium ore in U235 produces the fuel for power plants and the explosive for bombs. And the plutonium extracted from the plants can also be used as explosive material. The EPR will be no exception to this rule. The desire to export it therefore amounts to authorising one hand to do what the other hand is banned from doing. In a sense, it is tempting the devil: every State with an EPR will be able (if it so decides one day) to use it as Trojan Horse for its Bomb. The international community is becoming aware of this in the case of Iran, not before time, after letting Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea obtain atomic weapons under the cover of non-military programmes.

That is why ACDN suggested to the Iranian government, by letter and during an audience at its Paris embassy on March 30, that it renounce its civilian nuclear programme and assume a leading role among nations promoting the abandonment of nuclear plants, energy economies, the development of sustainable energies, and nuclear disarmament. Although this suggestion was not adopted, it remains an option today, at the time when the “Iran dossier” threatens to result in “international sanctions”, and even in military action envisaged by the USA, action which could even include the use of nuclear weapons. That would be a crowning irony, given the ostensible desire to prevent... the use of nuclear weapons.

This question will be raised again during the 2nd RID-NBC (Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) which takes place on 6-8 May in Saintes (Western France). On 6 May 2006 at 5pm, in the Auditorium Saintonge, there is a public debate on the subject: « Civilian and Military Nuclear Technology: the Iran Dossier”. One of the speakers will be Mr Moujani, who heads the diplomatic mission in France of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

We call on the citizens and elected representatives of France and Europe to be engaged in this dialogue and to set an example of nuclear renunciation by demanding the immediate suspension of the EPR programme.

ACDN, 15 April 2006


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version


Share through social networks

Also in this section

VIENNA DECLARATION
In Washington, Sarkozy is defending France’s nuclear deterrence
A great patriot, arms-merchant and atom-merchant
26 September: The UN’s World Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons
August 9, 1945: Why Nagasaki?
DECLARATION of the "Nuclear Phasing Out" French Network on the Current "Iranian Crisis"
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Commemorated in France and around the world
After 18 years in prison, Mordechai Vanunu was finally released
Claude Piéplu, artist, big-hearted man, friend and activist for Nuclear Disarmament passed away
France breaks its word and provokes the international community.

navigation motscles

Civilian and millitary nuclearism
ADDRESS to the 2nd RHODES ANTINUCLEAR FESTIVAL
DECLARATION of the Mediterranean No Nuclear Neighbourhood - MN3
Should we scrap the NPT and dismantle the IAEA?
Nobel Peace Prize award to Mohammed El-Baradei and the IAEA
On Indo-US Nuke Deal
THE CRISIS IS NOT RESOLVING ITSELF
Why the Nuclear Energy Path is Suicidal
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
The team of "Energy Challenge" made landfall at Sainte Anne de la Martinique
Phasing Out Military AND Civilian Nuclearism
EPR
FRANCE
Nicolas Sarkozy considering the future role of nuclear weapons in our system of defense
At the UN, France Must Move to the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons
Phasing out nuclear power is not enough
Good News from Russia: nuclear disarmament progressing... unintentionally!
Barack Obama undertakes to work for the abolition of nuclear weapons
Towards a UN Investigation into Depleted Uranium in Gaza
50 years of French nuclear weapons, 50 years too many!
Ségolène Royal : "the denuclearisation of the planet is a vision that I share".
Alain Juppé, the Minister of Defense, replies to the president of ACDN
Will France be caught with its plants down?
IRAN
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
Leading Americans Ask U.S. Military to Refuse Orders to Attack Iran
Iran and the Bomb
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
For a Middle East without Weapons of Mass Destruction
Neither Bush nor Blair is in a position to take a high moral line on Iran’s nuclear programme
Report on Iran’s Nuclear Programme Sent to UN Security Council
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
Appeal to All Europeans To Prevent War Against Iran
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
Nuclear power plants
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
France’s new president planning to sell nuclear power plants to Algeria
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
IRANIAN PLEA
Nuclear is not the Answer
Implications of the US-India nuclear deal and the task for the peace movement
France is going to change her method of enriching uranium
A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
US-India Nuclear Deal
The four-handed game of French nuclear policy
War
In Gaza, Genocide by Depleted Uranium has begun
The death-cult
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
Generals opposing Iraq war break with military tradition
Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran
Israelis consider attack on Iran
US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits
Calling for a cease-fire
The fallout from an attack on Iran would be devastating
No to War, No to NATO!

visites :  1030227

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs