ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > Communiqués > No to civil and military nuclearism!
ACDN, What is it ?

News
Communiqués
External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Actions
2nd RID-NBC
3rd RID-NBC
Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World

Petitions

Correspondance
International

Medias

Background papers

EUROPE

French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

No to the EPR!
No to civil and military nuclearism!
A solution for the Iran crisis.


Published 15 April 2006

There are many reasons for opposing the building of the EPR (European Pressurised Reactor), as was seen on April 15 at the great demonstration in Cherbourg. But there is one which is highlighted by international events and which deserves to be emphasized: the EPR would contribute to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the risks of nuclear war.

France has no need of the EPR; it is conceived above all for export. Plans of it have already been sold to Finland. The first prototype and the one planned for Flamanville (Normandy) - if its construction were to go ahead - will be shop-windows intended to capture foreign buyers from around the world and particularly the developing nations. AREVA and EDF have already been approaching China and India, with the support of the French foreign office. President Chirac’s recent trip to India had two major commercial objectives: to sell arms, such as submarines and warplanes, and to sell nuclear plants, like the future EPR.

On 30 March 2006, Iran proposed the setting-up of an international consortium including France, Germany and Russia, to help the Iranians to realise their non-military nuclear ambitions. There is no doubt that if this consortium were set up France and Germany, being associated with the EPR through AREVA and SIEMENS, would use it as a sales argument.

But consider the current crisis surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme. What does it confirm? That nuclear technologies are dual, that it is impossible to build a firewall between their civilian use for energy production and their military use for making weapons. The same knowledge and the same technicians produce both, as is verified also in France. The same process of enriching uranium ore in U235 produces the fuel for power plants and the explosive for bombs. And the plutonium extracted from the plants can also be used as explosive material. The EPR will be no exception to this rule. The desire to export it therefore amounts to authorising one hand to do what the other hand is banned from doing. In a sense, it is tempting the devil: every State with an EPR will be able (if it so decides one day) to use it as Trojan Horse for its Bomb. The international community is becoming aware of this in the case of Iran, not before time, after letting Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea obtain atomic weapons under the cover of non-military programmes.

That is why ACDN suggested to the Iranian government, by letter and during an audience at its Paris embassy on March 30, that it renounce its civilian nuclear programme and assume a leading role among nations promoting the abandonment of nuclear plants, energy economies, the development of sustainable energies, and nuclear disarmament. Although this suggestion was not adopted, it remains an option today, at the time when the “Iran dossier” threatens to result in “international sanctions”, and even in military action envisaged by the USA, action which could even include the use of nuclear weapons. That would be a crowning irony, given the ostensible desire to prevent... the use of nuclear weapons.

This question will be raised again during the 2nd RID-NBC (Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) which takes place on 6-8 May in Saintes (Western France). On 6 May 2006 at 5pm, in the Auditorium Saintonge, there is a public debate on the subject: « Civilian and Military Nuclear Technology: the Iran Dossier”. One of the speakers will be Mr Moujani, who heads the diplomatic mission in France of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

We call on the citizens and elected representatives of France and Europe to be engaged in this dialogue and to set an example of nuclear renunciation by demanding the immediate suspension of the EPR programme.

ACDN, 15 April 2006


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version


Share through social networks

Also in this section

Ukraine: Ten Demands to Return to Peace
60 French parliamentarians call for the abolition of nuclear weapons and propose a referendum
Barbarism above our heads, paid for by our taxes
Why Nicolas Sarkozy is asking Germany not to renounce nuclear power "the energy of the future".
STOP NUCLEAR WAR!
World Peace March and Global Nuclear Legacy Project
Towards a 2nd "Disarm to Live" Festival in Saintes on 6-9 August 2024
The campaign for a referendum on nuclear disarmament is launched
THE ECOLOGISTS MAKE THEIR COMMITMENTS
Outbreak of "American Fever" in Saintes

navigation motscles

Civilian and millitary nuclearism
IRAN : No proliferation! No war!
France is going to change her method of enriching uranium
ADDRESS to the 2nd RHODES ANTINUCLEAR FESTIVAL
Phasing Out Military AND Civilian Nuclearism
Mohamed ElBaradei - Nobel Lecture
Nobel Peace Prize award to Mohammed El-Baradei and the IAEA
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
2nd Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical
DECLARATION of the Mediterranean No Nuclear Neighbourhood - MN3
THE CRISIS IS NOT RESOLVING ITSELF
EPR
FRANCE
Will France be caught with its plants down?
Worldwide nuclear disarmament is the only response to anarchic proliferation
Latest Vintage from Champagne: New Rafale jets now carrying new ASMP-A missiles and new TNA nuclear warheads!
At the UN, France Must Move to the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear disarmament -an absolutely urgent task
50 years of French nuclear weapons, 50 years too many!
Ségolène Royal : "the denuclearisation of the planet is a vision that I share".
Will the French Constitutional Council invalidate the candidacies of Ségolène Royal, Nicolas Sarkozy et Jean-Marie Le Pen?
The Farce of France’s Nuclear Strike Force
Will Citizens’ Action lay down its arms?
IRAN
War against Iran
Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
WWIII or Bust: Implications of a US Attack on Iran
WHO IS LYING? AND FEEDING DISINFORMATION? WHO IS OPPRESSING WHOM?
Russian Military Sources Warn Attack on Iran 6 April
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
Iran and the Bomb
"Israel will not lower its guard." Nor will Bush and Sarkozy.
Nuclear power plants
France’s new president planning to sell nuclear power plants to Algeria
IRANIAN PLEA
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
On Indo-US Nuke Deal
The four-handed game of French nuclear policy
Nuclear is not the Answer
US-India Nuclear Deal
Implications of the US-India nuclear deal and the task for the peace movement
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
War
US Air Strikes
PARLIAMENTARIANS AND CIVIL SOCIETY APPEAL ON IRAN AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
The fallout from an attack on Iran would be devastating
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
In Gaza, Genocide by Depleted Uranium has begun
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
President Sarkozy is ready to support the "bombing of Iran"...
Israelis consider attack on Iran
Letter to President Jacques Chirac, 6 April 2003
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize

visites :  1235338

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs