ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > Communiqués > No to civil and military nuclearism!
ACDN, What is it ?

External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World




Background papers


French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

No to the EPR!
No to civil and military nuclearism!
A solution for the Iran crisis.

Published 15 April 2006

There are many reasons for opposing the building of the EPR (European Pressurised Reactor), as was seen on April 15 at the great demonstration in Cherbourg. But there is one which is highlighted by international events and which deserves to be emphasized: the EPR would contribute to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the risks of nuclear war.

France has no need of the EPR; it is conceived above all for export. Plans of it have already been sold to Finland. The first prototype and the one planned for Flamanville (Normandy) - if its construction were to go ahead - will be shop-windows intended to capture foreign buyers from around the world and particularly the developing nations. AREVA and EDF have already been approaching China and India, with the support of the French foreign office. President Chirac’s recent trip to India had two major commercial objectives: to sell arms, such as submarines and warplanes, and to sell nuclear plants, like the future EPR.

On 30 March 2006, Iran proposed the setting-up of an international consortium including France, Germany and Russia, to help the Iranians to realise their non-military nuclear ambitions. There is no doubt that if this consortium were set up France and Germany, being associated with the EPR through AREVA and SIEMENS, would use it as a sales argument.

But consider the current crisis surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme. What does it confirm? That nuclear technologies are dual, that it is impossible to build a firewall between their civilian use for energy production and their military use for making weapons. The same knowledge and the same technicians produce both, as is verified also in France. The same process of enriching uranium ore in U235 produces the fuel for power plants and the explosive for bombs. And the plutonium extracted from the plants can also be used as explosive material. The EPR will be no exception to this rule. The desire to export it therefore amounts to authorising one hand to do what the other hand is banned from doing. In a sense, it is tempting the devil: every State with an EPR will be able (if it so decides one day) to use it as Trojan Horse for its Bomb. The international community is becoming aware of this in the case of Iran, not before time, after letting Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea obtain atomic weapons under the cover of non-military programmes.

That is why ACDN suggested to the Iranian government, by letter and during an audience at its Paris embassy on March 30, that it renounce its civilian nuclear programme and assume a leading role among nations promoting the abandonment of nuclear plants, energy economies, the development of sustainable energies, and nuclear disarmament. Although this suggestion was not adopted, it remains an option today, at the time when the “Iran dossier” threatens to result in “international sanctions”, and even in military action envisaged by the USA, action which could even include the use of nuclear weapons. That would be a crowning irony, given the ostensible desire to prevent... the use of nuclear weapons.

This question will be raised again during the 2nd RID-NBC (Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) which takes place on 6-8 May in Saintes (Western France). On 6 May 2006 at 5pm, in the Auditorium Saintonge, there is a public debate on the subject: « Civilian and Military Nuclear Technology: the Iran Dossier”. One of the speakers will be Mr Moujani, who heads the diplomatic mission in France of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

We call on the citizens and elected representatives of France and Europe to be engaged in this dialogue and to set an example of nuclear renunciation by demanding the immediate suspension of the EPR programme.

ACDN, 15 April 2006

L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version

Share through social networks

Also in this section

Marching On towards Nuclear Crime
Why Nicolas Sarkozy is asking Germany not to renounce nuclear power "the energy of the future".
A great patriot, arms-merchant and atom-merchant
Nuclear Disarmament Groups Worldwide Welcome Obama Pledge to Take Nuke Weapons Off Alert
Barbarism above our heads, paid for by our taxes
In New York, and in the Bure Region (Champagne), France Digs Herself Deeper into Nuclear Folly
After 18 years in prison, Mordechai Vanunu was finally released
The Good-Guy, the Brute and the Seven Mercenaries

navigation motscles

Civilian and millitary nuclearism
Should we scrap the NPT and dismantle the IAEA?
Phasing Out Military AND Civilian Nuclearism
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
The Nuclear Issue: Disarm and Live
On Indo-US Nuke Deal
IRAN : No proliferation! No war!
2nd Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical
Why the Nuclear Energy Path is Suicidal
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
France recognises her responsibility to the military and civilian victims of her nuclear tests
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
Towards a UN Investigation into Depleted Uranium in Gaza
Question to the Mayor of Paris, Bertrand Delanoë: What should France do?
For an ecologist candidacy in the Primary of the Left
Latest Vintage from Champagne: New Rafale jets now carrying new ASMP-A missiles and new TNA nuclear warheads!
Will France be caught with its plants down?
DECLARATION of the "Nuclear Phasing Out" French Network on the Current "Iranian Crisis"
Does François Bayrou really want nuclear disarmament ?
The Farce of France’s Nuclear Strike Force
Appeal to All Europeans To Prevent War Against Iran
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
The military’s problem with the President’s Iran policy.
For a Middle East without Weapons of Mass Destruction
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
WWIII or Bust: Implications of a US Attack on Iran
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
"Israel will not lower its guard." Nor will Bush and Sarkozy.
Russian Military Sources Warn Attack on Iran 6 April
Letter to Iran’s ambassador in Paris
Nuclear power plants
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
Nuclear is not the Answer
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
US-India Nuclear Deal
Implications of the US-India nuclear deal and the task for the peace movement
The four-handed game of French nuclear policy
A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
France’s new president planning to sell nuclear power plants to Algeria
Israelis consider attack on Iran
US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits
Leading Americans Ask U.S. Military to Refuse Orders to Attack Iran
Open Letter on NATO Missile Defense Plans and Increased Risk of Nuclear War
In Gaza, Genocide by Depleted Uranium has begun
Our Troops Must Leave Iraq
UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells. Europe contaminated?
No to War, No to NATO!
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran

visites :  1104992

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs